Pakistan's 3/30: Tracing Munawan Attack in Lahore

This is the weekly pager from the Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS), Islamabad, Pakistan. CRSS believes in academic neutrality and focuses on regional and domestic issues that affect the State and Society of Pakistan. We are a non-profit organization committed to promoting critical thinking in a democratic Pakistan.   If you do not wish to receive emails from The Center, please reply to this mail with “Remove” in the body of text.

Pakistan’s 3/30: Tracing Munawan Attack in Lahore

What happened: Munawan police training facility is on the road to the international border between India and Paksitan and border is hardly a few kilometers away. On 30 March 2009, at 7:30 a.m. local time, nearly a dozen gunmen, some faking as police officials, attacked and took control of the training facility. The militants killed five police recruits & two trainers and injured dozens others. It took Punjab Police’s special anti-terrorist force called “Elite Force” 8 hours to recapture the school buildings. At least 3 of the militants reportedly blew themselves up while 3 others were taken into custody, one of them arrested from just outside the building when he tried to blow up an Army helicopter. Identified later as Hijratullah, he turned out to be an Afghan national from Paktika and was sent on a mission by Baitullah Mehsud’s Tehrik-e-Taliban Paksitan (TTP).   The following day, Fedayeen-e-Islam, a little-known but Taliban affiliated group, claimed responsibility. It should be noted that the same group had claimed responsibility for the bombing at the Marriott Islamabad on 20 September 2008. The same day, Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (formed: December 2007), called The Associated Press and Reuters to claim responsibility.   Three pronged situation building: Like many other terrorist incidents, it would be difficult to trace all the trails of the planning, execution and funding of this terrorist operation but three scenarios could be built on the basis of the publicly available information:   Did Baitullah Mehsud’s TTP do it? On February 21, Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani left for a week-long official visit to the U.S. just when the Obama Administration was in the process of reviewing America’s Pak-Afghan strategy. On February 27, Chairman U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen told a news conference at Pentagon that the visit of Pakistan Army Chief to the U.S. was “fruitful”. On March 25, the U.S. Department of State authorized a reward of “up to $5 million for information leading to the location, arrest, and/or conviction of Baitullah Mehsud the senior leader of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan.” The same day, CIA drones fired two missiles and killed eight in an attack on a Taliban convoy in Makeen, the hometown of Baitullah Mehsud. Baitullah Mehsud, during his conversation with Reuters, said that he attacked the police academy in response to drone attacks.   Or was it Lashkar-e-Taiba executed operation? Lashkar-e-Taiba – the organization that has been banned by Pakistan, India, the U.S., the U.K., the European Union, Russia and Australia – or disgruntled elements within the Lashkar. Although the Lashkar has little or no past history in directing its attacks against Pakistan but given the recent history of the militant organizations in Pakistan, it could be established that the LeT may have orchestrated this activity. None from LeT thus far has claimed any responsibility.   Any chance of Indian involvement? Bahukutumbi Raman – the former head of the counter-terrorism division of the Research & Analysis Wing (RAW) and also a former member of the Special Task Force of the Government of India for the Revamping of the Intelligence Apparatus – within hours of the Mumbai tragedy (Nov. 26, 2008) presented his recommendations to the Government of India. B. Raman proposed that when Ashok Chaturvedi, then Director RAW who retires on 31 January 2009, must be replaced by someone from outside RAW preferably a top-notch covert operator to re-energize RAW’s covert capabilities to undertake operations inside Pakistan. On January 25, K.C. Verma, a career officer of the Intelligence Bureau, India ’s internal intelligence agency, was named as the new chief of the Research & Analysis Wing. K.C. Verma’s appointment came as a surprise to India’s bulging intelligence bureaucracy because P.V. Kumar was the senior-most RAW officer after Ashok Chaturvedi’s retirement.   B. Raman, in a previous paper, raised the question of “how to make Pakistan pay a price…” made this recommendation: “Through covert action, which is deniable para-political and para-military action meant to make Pakistan’s sponsorship prohibitively costly to it. Such a covert action would be directed against the Pakistan State and society and not against terrorists.”[1] B Raman, enjoys a close and trusted association with India’s official security and intelligence apparatus.     Dr C. Raja Mohan, widely acknowledged as one of “India’s leading foreign policy analyst,” has argued that if Pakistan is “not willing or is unable to deliver an end to cross-border terrorism” then perhaps India ought to execute alternatives. On 10 December 2008, the Hindustan Times carried a column by Gurmeet Kanwal, head of the Center for Land Warfare Studies, recommending that “To achieve a lasting impact and ensure that the actual perpetrators of terrorism are targeted, it is necessary to employ covert capabilities…..” against Pakistan.[2]   Another angle: Christine Fair, Senior Political Scientist, RAND Corporation, suspected the Indian involvement in Balochistan has increased with encouragement from Kabul.[3] It is an interesting assessment as most of the militant organizations operating in Pakistan have their ideological and financial base operating from Afghanistan.

Comments/remarks: pager@crss.pk

 

---

[1] http://www.saag.org/common/uploaded_files/paper1893.html  - last accessed on April 4, 2009.

[2] http://hindustantimes.com

[3] The News, April 6, 2009.

Posted via email from DesiDiary.Com

Thought Transformaion

Thought Transformation BY Adnan Gill

Tuesday, 07 April 2009 00:00

The final straw for me turned to be the disappointing remarks widely circulating among the journalists' forums. In short, their remarks toe the line Taliban and their apologists, the ANP have adopted on the deplorable episode. After reading their comments my conscious didn't allow me stay quite anymore. At the risk of inviting wrath of many, I would like to state the following: 1. Please don't label capitulation to the oppressors as the so-called ‘national interests'; as if allowing a state within a state merits to be called a state to begin with. Please don't take refuge behind ‘national interests' when it comes to chauvinism. Bravery doesn't mean locking women (mothers, daughters, sisters or wives) behind 7 doors. A real man gouges the eyes out of a pervert who even dares to looks at them with malice. A man of his salt defends the weak and not incarcerates them. 2. Shoot the message and not the messenger. I was hoping to see a healthy debate on the subject from highly educated and esteemed journalists, but not personal attacks on Ms. Summar. What a shame! 3. Flagrant abuse of women's rights at the hands of self-righteous Taliban isn't actually a secret in an age of camera equipped cell phones. I am old enough to remember how Taliban slowly tightened their noose around women's rights in Afghanistan. At the height of their rule, birthing mothers were allowed to die, over allowing them to be taken to hospital without a ‘mahrum'/male-escort. Others died because they were forbidden to seek medical help from male physicians. While the lady-doctors were not allowed to work altogether under the pretexts of: they can't work in the same facilities where male counterparts worked too; and allegedly, there was no money to build or run schools and hospitals, exclusively for women. Bravo, what a justice system! 4. If the video is fake, then why did ANP minister Mian Iftikhar and the Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan earlier accepted the occurrence of incident? Didn't they also allege that she was punished for illicit relationship with her father-in-law? They even had nerve to suggest, that she should have been thankful that she wasn't stoned to death. Latter on, these men first launched attacks on Ms. Summar and then started to question the authenticity of the tape. I cringe to imagine how some people could even give a second thought to their doubletalk. 5. Two wrongs don't make a right. Just because bloody and senseless war in Sawat was wrong, doesn't mean abuse of women's rights cannot be condemned either. Pacification of abuse of any sort should be condemned loudly, or it would bread even more severe abuse. 6. Can someone please enlighten me how many ANP politicians (along with their families) are currently residing in the Sawat Valley? What a brave trendsetting men they are! 7. If Talibanization is a just cause and has become all too real, then instead of going on defensive, shouldn't they accept their actions with courage? I call them to stand up and be counted for condoning Talibanization! 8. If it was my daughter, starting with the man delivering lashes, I would have put a bullet through everyone's eyes gathered there. At minimum, I would shoot her and I before becoming a spectacle for the (na-mehrum) perverts watching whole perverse episode. I can't stress enough, my disappoint with those defending the most deplorable, shameless, barbaric and un-Islamic actions of these self-righteous barbarians.

Posted via email from DesiDiary.Com